🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “total contradiction” for campaigning against tobacco control measures in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Documents seen by journalists dispatched by the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the country’s government ministers requests proposals to prohibit tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be scrapped or postponed.

The corporation is pursuing modifications of a proposed legislation that include reductions in the suggested dimensions of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on flavored smoking items, and reduced sanctions for any companies violating the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“If I was a politician, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” commented the anti-tobacco campaigner.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year pass away from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to WHO calculations.

Chimbala said the letter was known to have been circulated to multiple official agencies and was in distribution within public interest organizations.

International corporate influence worries

It comes amid expanded apprehension about corporate intervention with public health regulations. Recently, global health authorities sounded an alarm that the smoking product companies was increasing attempts to weaken global control measures.

“We see evidence of business advocacy everywhere. Tobacco company fingerprints are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN international gathering,” commented the corporate monitoring director.

Possible outcomes

“If a tobacco control measure doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the cost might be borne in human lives who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The public health measure being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and requiring that graphic health warnings cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Through correspondence, the company recommends this be reduced to thirty to fifty percent “according to global guideline limits”, deferred for no less than one year after the bill passes.

The WHO specifically advises a caution must occupy at least fifty percent of the cigarette package face “and aim to cover as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings are required to occupy nearly two-thirds of a product container sides.

Scented product controversy

BAT asks for the elimination of comprehensive limitations on scented smoking items, claiming that it would drive users to “illicitly sold” products. The corporation recommends prohibiting a smaller list of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been banned in the UK since 2020.

The proposed legislation recommends punishments for different infractions “ranging from a percentage of annual turnover to a decade in prison”.

Business explanation

Via documentation, the corporate leader of the Zambian branch states the company is dedicated to responsible corporate conduct” and “endorses the aims of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the connected wellbeing effects” but maintains that “certain measures can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Activist reaction

The campaigner argued the corporation's recommended amendments would “dilute these regulations so much that the required influence for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that numerous similar measures were present in the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “complete contradiction”, he said.

“We exist in a global village. If I plant tobacco in my property and harvest that and distribute the goods – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to profit individually and all the subsequent offspring while my neighbor's family are perishing … is in itself absolute spiritual failure.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the UK or elsewhere had not caused companies to close, the campaigner stated. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Official corporate statement

The company representative stated: “BAT Zambia conducts its activities following with applicable local laws. Moreover, the corporation engages in the state's regulatory development in line with the appropriate structures which provide for stakeholder participation in legislation creation.”

The firm positioned itself as “not against rules”, they said, mentioning that young individuals should be protected from acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We advocate for progressive regulation to realize planned community wellbeing objectives, while recognizing the range of rights and obligations on businesses, users and involved parties,” they said, mentioning that the corporation's recommendations “mirror the circumstances of the Zambian market and cigarette sector, which involves growing volumes of illegal commerce”.

The nation's ministry of business, commercial affairs and industrial development was approached for comment.