🔗 Share this article

Only two days before the NYC mayoral election, Michael Lange issued a significant electoral prediction – going beyond the winner overall, and precinct by precinct. The analyst, an expert in elections born and raised in the city, devoted over a decade in progressive politics and emerged as something of a local celebrity recently for his thorough analyses into city data and polling.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate would win although missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. Lange has a flair for witty coinages. He highlighted, as an example, the split between the “commie corridor”, running from one neighborhood to another area to Astoria, where he predicted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would win by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal outrank the New York Times” in audience and most voters favored the independent, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Trends and Surprises

What was your night?

I had to do that because they were adding approximately 200K ballots into the system every few minutes! I felt somewhat anxious initially: Mamdani was ahead the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but there were two big batches of ballots added later and his lead dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world in which election day turned out somewhat badly for Mamdani, in which Cuomo was going to end up basically increasing his support from the Democratic primary. However the winner gained half a million votes to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He campaigned and greatly broadened his base from the first round.

Coalition Building

How did Mamdani gain additional support from?

He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: it’s multiracial, youthful, it’s renters and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He improved significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the primary. Plus he boosted his core of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He built the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: multiracial, young, tenants and residents squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were some Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It is a real thing, limited to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Muslims. Voters in ethnic enclaves that supported the former president last year backed the progressive now. But I wouldn’t say he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Effects

One of the big stories of the election was the record turnout. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Turnout was much greater than anticipated. I figured we might exceed two million, but it reached 2.3 million – that is a lot of darn voters. There was a decent anti-Mamdani block, energized, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Right now you would say he’s favored to get over half. He’s at just over 50% but there’s still probably 200,000 votes uncounted as of Wednesday morning. Thus it’s not it’s definitive, but I think probable, and I wish he achieves it so then none can claim Sliwa was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His support completely collapsed.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any area. Including Tottenville in Staten Island, which is like an highly conservative neighborhood. That truly was unexpected. The independent kept very white areas, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and then added all of these conservatives on Staten Island who had a strong turnout. I believe there was significant tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened before the former president endorsed for the candidate, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide unless the winning alliance failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your much mentioned “commie corridor” – was support for the candidate overwhelming in those areas of the boroughs?

I think there was some weakening of the progressive zone in some areas like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, instance, the property owners and homeowners all went for Cuomo. So there was some opposition. However overall, largely the commie corridor is another huge reason why Zohran won – he was polling between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the vote there was coverage on if the candidate was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

Exist neighborhoods with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like specific locales – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts such as the Manhattan area, his position on Israel was influential in those places. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they all leaned the independent. And also, there are newcomers from the former Soviet Union in the borough, they were pretty staunchly Cuomo. So it’s unclear if there were crazy narrative-busters on this one, but Mamdani did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what New York represents in politics? Will progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s not accidental that key figures from the left come from a few areas in the boroughs. I’m sure that there will be more of that – people will come from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

However I believe that each urban center in America could develop their own commie corridor. Cities are the centers of progressive influence in the nation – since youth reside there, tenancy is common and they are places where people are crushed by the disparities exist.